2

I'm looking for established limits or rules of thumb for the validity/accuracy of Euler-Bernoulli beam equations for particularly wide "beams". For example, a simply supported rectangular plate where the breadth(b) is much larger than the height (h) [e.g. b=120 inches, h=1 inch].

Is there a point at which a simply supported beam where b >> h would deflect more like a plate in plate theory rather than a beam in beam theory? If you can, please provide references. Thank you!

NMech
  • 23,917
  • 2
  • 30
  • 72
willpower2727
  • 725
  • 4
  • 12

1 Answers1

5

For a rectangular simply supported plate with length $a$ and width $b$ (Roark's Formulas for stress and strain):

$$\sigma_{max} = \sigma_b= \frac{\beta qb^2} {t^2} $$

$\beta$ ranges from 0.287 for a=b to 0.75 for a very long and narrow beam. 0.75 would make it equal to a beam. At a=5b ,$\beta$ is 0.74.

Approximately at $a> 5b$ the plate behaves very similarly to a beam.

kamran
  • 21,714
  • 2
  • 18
  • 38